Quantcast
Channel: ADSM.ORG
Viewing all 2470 articles
Browse latest View live
↧

Cannot restore old backups - File truncated

June 15, 2014, 8:42 am
$
0
0
I have a problem restoring some old backups (using TDP for Domino, obviously) that were done in December 2010. Whichever NSF database I try to restore, it fails with this client side message:

Code:
File truncated - file may have been damaged
ACD5702E A Domino API error has occurred.
On server side, the message is:
Code:
06/13/2014 11:23:09      ANR8213E Socket 7 aborted due to send error; error 104.                          (SESSION: 37474)
06/13/2014 11:23:09      ANR0514I Session 37474 closed volume EID622L4. (SESSION:                          37474)
06/13/2014  11:23:09      ANR0480W Session 37474 for node DATA1_DOMINO_LT (TDP  DomLINUX64) terminated - connection with client severed.                            (SESSION: 37474)
06/13/2014 11:23:09      ANR8213E Socket 7 aborted due to send error; error 32.                          (SESSION: 37474)
The result of 'query dbbackup' also looks strange:

Code:
IBM Tivoli Storage Manager for Mail:
Data Protection for Lotus Domino
Version 7, Release 1, Level 0.0
(C) Copyright IBM Corporation 1999, 2013. All rights reserved.
 
                            Database Backup List
                            --------------------
 
    Domino Server: Data1
    --------------
 
  DB Backup Date        Size      A/I  Logged  Database Title  Database File
---------------------  -----------  ---  ------  --------------  -------------
12/31/2013 17:51:22      154.50MB  A    Yes    Tootajad        tootajad.nsf
07/03/2013 06:04:24      154.50MB  I    Yes    Tootajad        tootajad.nsf
12/31/2012 17:52:42      100.00MB  I    Yes    Tootajad        tootajad.nsf
06/30/2012 21:33:11        98.50MB  I    Yes    Tootajad        tootajad.nsf
12/29/2011 00:49:13        98.50MB  I    Yes    Tootajad        tootajad.nsf
07/01/2011 02:36:16        98.50MB  I    Yes    Tootajad        tootajad.nsf
12/29/2010 03:18:22      399.00PB  I    Yes      tootajad.nsf
Note the last line, corresponding to the backup from which I cannot restore. The database size is clearly wrong and title is missing. This leads me to believe that this is not a media defect, but something else. A corruption of TSM database? Some kind of incompatibility between versions of Domino or TSM that was in use back then and today?

My records indicate that I performed a successful restore of this backup in November 2011.
Today I can successfully restore a backup made on 12/29/2011 (third one from bottom in the query output above). Haven't yet tried 07/01/2011, but I suspect this will also succeed.

At the time the backup was taken I was running:
TSM server 6.2.1
Domino server 8.0.2 FP6 (32bit)
TSM/TDP client on the Domino server: 6.2.1/5.5.2

Today:
TSM server 6.2.5
Domino server 9.0.1 FP1 64bit
TSM/TDP client on the Domino server: 7.1.0

Both client and server are Linux.
↧
Search

Problem with selective backup

June 16, 2014, 12:19 am
$
0
0
Hi everyone,

I have problem with selective backup on windows machine.
On this machine every day is running selective backup, part of files are already deleted but in TSM they still marked as active, and expire process don't delete it. Retextra and Retonly is set to 20 days but deleted files have 22 days and it's still active.
↧
↧

EMC Data Domain + TSM backup in one invironment

June 16, 2014, 2:03 am
$
0
0
Hello Every one,

I came to a new invironment which have already TSM installed, but not taking any new backups, instead they are configuring EMC backup to replace TSM, or in another word, to take new backups.
The case that they want to keep the TSM ONLY for old backups and archives, which means it have to be up and running normally.. and have the EMC for new operation of backing up all data.

only one tape library with multiple drives is available. i believe that it is not right to manage 1 tape library with 2 backyup solutions? am i right? any similar experience?
↧

TSM Full VM restore

June 17, 2014, 4:58 am
$
0
0
Hi All,
just need to confirm if a Full VM restore will bring the VM powered off or on.

we dont want the new restored VM to be added without remove the network cards.

Thanks
↧

Full Restore Media

June 17, 2014, 8:47 am
$
0
0
Good morning friends,


I have a tape that was used in ancient TSM of company work. The problem is .... the database from the old TSM was lost and we are unable to restore what is on the tape.


Is there any program that restores all the information that is on this tape? In ARCserve just do the 'MERGE' tape he plays Tape information in the database, the TSM is there any way to do this?


From already thank you very much for the attention my friends.
↧
↧

ACO5424E Could not connect to SQL server; SQL server returned

June 17, 2014, 9:17 pm
$
0
0
Team,

I got the error on daily basis and i already checked the basic troubleshooting and one thing i wana tell you when i click to script manually the backup has been taken manually. Here is the detail error i got


CO5424E Could not connect to SQL server; SQL server returned:
06/18/2014 06:20:39 Failed to connect to server NCRISUITE.
06/18/2014 06:20:39 Timeout expired. The timeout period elapsed prior to completion of the operation or the server is not responding. (HRESULT:0x80131501)
↧

How can i display my daily backup size

June 17, 2014, 11:48 pm
$
0
0
Hello

I want to display, how much i backup at all nodes everyday. (I only need the Size-Value of all nodes together)

Can you please help me?

Thank you
Franky
↧

Unable to force media reuse

June 18, 2014, 8:17 am
$
0
0
Hi All,

The situation:
The tape library is full, but is low on scratch tapes. This is circumvented by active tapes being checked out & placed in onsite storage. This is tracked in TSM using Move Media.
There are 4 onsite volumes that have no active data and are in pending state. Normally the volumes would be be reclaimed by performing a delete vol.
Unfortunately the delete vol fails with: ANR1425W Scratch volume TAPE001 is empty but will not be deleted - volume state is "mountablenotinlib".
I am unable to perform a move media on the tape as move media only applies to full filling or empty volumes.

The Question:
I know I can expire the media quicker by changing the reuse delay of the storage pool, but is there another way of overriding the system?

Media details below if it is of any gain/interest.

Thank you in advance.
:confused:
tsm>query media tape001 stgpool=lto_onsite f=d
Volume Name: TL0381L4
State: Mountable not in library
Last Update Date/Time: 05/14/2014 14:55:09
Location: TSM onsite OVERFLOW Rack
Storage Pool Name: LTO_ONSITE
Automated LibName:
Volume Status: Pending
Access: Read/Write
Last Reference Date: 01/14/2014 13:21:16

tsm>q vol tape001 f=d
Volume Name: TAPE001
Storage Pool Name: LTO_ONSITE
Device Class Name: LTOCLASS4C
Estimated Capacity: 0.0 M
Scaled Capacity Applied:
Pct Util: 0.0
Volume Status: Pending
Access: Read/Write
Pct. Reclaimable Space: 0.0
Scratch Volume?: Yes
In Error State?: No
Number of Writable Sides: 1
Number of Times Mounted: 10
Write Pass Number: 1
Approx. Date Last Written: 01/11/2014 20:16:15
Approx. Date Last Read: 01/14/2014 13:21:16
Date Became Pending: 06/17/2014 16:01:15
Number of Write Errors: 0
Number of Read Errors: 0
Volume Location: LTO_ONSITE onsite OVERFLOW Rack
Volume is MVS Lanfree Capable : No
Last Update Date/Time: 06/18/2014 14:41:41
Begin Reclaim Period:
End Reclaim Period:
Drive Encryption Key Manager: None
↧
Search

TSM and Storage Pools + VTL

June 18, 2014, 9:00 am
$
0
0
We are currently building a new TSM environment. One of the questions poised is can you put your storage pools on a virtual tape library. I will elaborate. The main storage pool would be on the VTL and then are backup copy pools would also be on the VTL. I have looked into this with no success. Can someone direct me to a site or give me a answer as to why or why not. All logs and database will be on a NFSmount to a SAN.
↧
↧

Backups on disk to tape

June 18, 2014, 1:01 pm
$
0
0
I want to send backups that are on disk to tape, so I created the tape library and assign the path to library and drives (it has two), then I've labeled a tape, not sure if it's right, created the device class and storage pool. So when I put the tape as next storage pool and start the migration process nothing happens, so I missing something, something I left behind?
↧

Issue about data deduplication with protection against data lost

June 18, 2014, 3:49 pm
$
0
0
Hi,


We're running TSM server version 6.2, level 5.0 on AIX 7.1 (7100-00-02-1041).
Clients: Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2 Datacenter
TSM client version: Backup/archive version 7, release 1, level 0.2.

DedupRequiresBackup: Yes
Server-side and client-side data duplication enabled.

According to the manual "IBM Tivoli Storage Manager for AIX: Administrator's Guide" (Tivoli Storage Manager for AIX V 6.2):

"Client-side data deduplication has a possible disadvantage. The server does not
have whole copies of client files until you back up the primary storage pools that
contain client extents to a non-deduplicated copy storage pool. (Extents are parts of
a file that are created during the data-deduplication process.) During storage pool
backup to non-deduplicated storage pool, client extents are reassembled into
contiguous files.


Server-side data deduplication offers more protection against data loss. By default,
primary sequential-access storage pools that are set up for data deduplication must
be backed up to non-deduplicated copy storage pools before they can be reclaimed
and before duplicate data can be removed. The default ensures that the server has
copies of whole files at all times, in either a primary storage pool or a copy storage
pool."


And acording to this source http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infoce...resbackup.html about DEDUPREQUIRESBACKUP server option:

"The DEDUPREQUIRESBACKUP option specifies whether volumes in primary sequential-access storage pools that are set up for deduplication can be reclaimed and whether duplicate data can be discarded before the storage pools are backed up.
If the value of this option is YES (the default), you must back up data to copy storage pools that are not set up for deduplication. Use the BACKUP STGPOOL command to back up data to copy storage pools.Be aware that reclamation of a volume in a storage pool that is set up for deduplication might not occur when the volume first becomes eligible. The server makes additional checks to ensure that data from a storage pool that is set up for deduplication has been backed up to a copy storage pool. These checks require more than one BACKUP STGPOOL instance before the server reclaims a volume. After the server verifies that the data was backed up, the volume is reclaimed.
You can change this option dynamically using the SETOPT command.
Attention: To minimize the possibility of data loss, do not change the default setting for this server option. Specify a value of NO only if you do not have any copy storage pools and are not performing storage pool backups."


Some questions:

a) Do we really need to backup data from the primary sequential-access storage pool to copy storage pools that are NOT set up for deduplication? What are the consequences of not doing that?
b) Does the backup from the primary sequential-access storage pool to a (remote) single copy storage pool deduplicated replace the protection against the data lost? Assume (i) primary product server or data center damage and (ii) data integrity errors. Are the risks same for server-side and cliente-side data deduplication?
c) Why the backup of a primary storage pool to a copy storage pool that is set up for data deduplication remove duplicate data?


Thanks,


mahalik
↧

TSM 7.1 implementation test bugs

June 19, 2014, 12:05 am
$
0
0
Hey

Anyone done 7.1 implementation? http://www-03.ibm.com/certify/tests/ovrC2010-511.shtml

I passed it on Tuesday and IMO there were four questions that were not complete. Those had the question, answers but not the premise for the question. Anyone else noticed the same?

I'd been pretty pissed if the result had been closed fail, but even so I informed the testing facility about the problem and they'll pass it on.

BTW anyone know when 7.1 administartion cert will be availablle, might do that as well.
↧

Missed Nodes!!! Is there any way to help

June 19, 2014, 1:29 am
$
0
0
Hi Guys

There are three nodes which are getting missed daily. I have done the following

1. removed the old scheduler and added new scheduler
2. made CAD to perform the scheduling
3. TSM Scheduler service manual and not started, whereas CAD service is automatic and started.

Please help !!!
↧
↧

Differences and Scope of Online exams and direct exams

June 19, 2014, 2:41 am
$
0
0
Hi Guys

I have chosen to write A2010-598: Assess: IBM Tivoli Storage Manager V6.3 Administration online, But the fees is USD 30.

If I select other available exams, Pearson showed me C2010-598 IBM Tivoli Storage Manager V6.3 Administration, But the fee is USD 100.

Please let me know differences. I'm worried which one to write and which one is valid .

and what is the difference between A and C in the codes.

cheers
Diaz
↧

Datamover registration fails

June 19, 2014, 4:13 pm
$
0
0
Hey all. New to TSM/large data backups in general.

I recently installed a few tape arrays, an AIX server with TSM, a couple of Dell 7610's with Fluid FS, and 4 Dell 6510 Equallogic disk storage arrays. We have about 200 TB of large data files to backup.

The problem I'm having is that datamover registration fails after TSM receives the backup type information. A packet capture and the logs confirm that TSM and NDMPD exchange authentication, which passes, server information, host information, and backup type information then TSM reports that registration fails.

Since the TSM disconnects immediately after receiving the backup type info I assume that the packet contains incomplete information. Below is the NDMPD logs which outlines the information passed to the TSM before the TSM closes the connection.

DG:CM 06/19 11:08:56.208112 802:7a4a8160 msg_diag.c:ndmp_config_get_butype_info_reply_pri START BUTYPE_INFO, error: NDMP_NO_ERR
DG:CM 06/19 11:08:56.208128 802:7a4a8160 msg_diag.c:ndmp_config_get_butype_info_reply_pri butype_name:dump
DG:CM 06/19 11:08:56.208143 802:7a4a8160 msg_diag.c:logNdmpPvals:2635 len: 19
DG:CM 06/19 11:08:56.208159 802:7a4a8160 msg_diag.c:logNdmpPvals:2638 {name: FILESYSTEM, value: }
DG:CM 06/19 11:08:56.208174 802:7a4a8160 msg_diag.c:logNdmpPvals:2638 {name: EXCLUDE, value: }
DG:CM 06/19 11:08:56.208190 802:7a4a8160 msg_diag.c:logNdmpPvals:2638 {name: HIST, value: Y}
DG:CM 06/19 11:08:56.208212 802:7a4a8160 msg_diag.c:logNdmpPvals:2638 {name: VERBOSE, value: N}
DG:CM 06/19 11:08:56.208231 802:7a4a8160 msg_diag.c:logNdmpPvals:2638 {name: LEVEL, value: 0}
DG:CM 06/19 11:08:56.208252 802:7a4a8160 msg_diag.c:logNdmpPvals:2638 {name: UPDATE, value: Y}
DG:CM 06/19 11:08:56.208267 802:7a4a8160 msg_diag.c:logNdmpPvals:2638 {name: COMPRESS_DATA_STREAM, value: N}
DG:CM 06/19 11:08:56.208283 802:7a4a8160 msg_diag.c:logNdmpPvals:2638 {name: SNAPSHOT, value: Y}
DG:CM 06/19 11:08:56.208298 802:7a4a8160 msg_diag.c:logNdmpPvals:2638 {name: EXTRACT_ACL, value: Y}
DG:CM 06/19 11:08:56.208313 802:7a4a8160 msg_diag.c:logNdmpPvals:2638 {name: BLOCKING_FACTOR, value: 0}
DG:CM 06/19 11:08:56.208329 802:7a4a8160 msg_diag.c:logNdmpPvals:2638 {name: BASE_DATE, value: -1}
DG:CM 06/19 11:08:56.208344 802:7a4a8160 msg_diag.c:logNdmpPvals:2638 {name: LISTED_INCREMENTAL, value: N}
DG:CM 06/19 11:08:56.208359 802:7a4a8160 msg_diag.c:logNdmpPvals:2638 {name: DEREF_HARD_LINK, value: N}
DG:CM 06/19 11:08:56.208374 802:7a4a8160 msg_diag.c:logNdmpPvals:2638 {name: NUM_DATA_READER, value: -1}
DG:CM 06/19 11:08:56.208390 802:7a4a8160 msg_diag.c:logNdmpPvals:2638 {name: DIRECT, value: N}
DG:CM 06/19 11:08:56.208405 802:7a4a8160 msg_diag.c:logNdmpPvals:2638 {name: RECURSIVE, value: Y}
DG:CM 06/19 11:08:56.208420 802:7a4a8160 msg_diag.c:logNdmpPvals:2638 {name: RESTORE_OVERWRITE, value: Y}
DG:CM 06/19 11:08:56.208435 802:7a4a8160 msg_diag.c:logNdmpPvals:2638 {name: READ_AHEAD, value: }
DG:CM 06/19 11:08:56.208451 802:7a4a8160 msg_diag.c:logNdmpPvals:2638 {name: NUM_FILE_OPENER, value: -1}
DG:CM 06/19 11:08:56.208466 802:7a4a8160 msg_diag.c:ndmp_config_get_butype_info_reply_pri butype_name:tar
DG:CM 06/19 11:08:56.208481 802:7a4a8160 msg_diag.c:logNdmpPvals:2635 len: 19
DG:CM 06/19 11:08:56.208496 802:7a4a8160 msg_diag.c:logNdmpPvals:2638 {name: FILESYSTEM, value: }
DG:CM 06/19 11:08:56.208512 802:7a4a8160 msg_diag.c:logNdmpPvals:2638 {name: EXCLUDE, value: }
DG:CM 06/19 11:08:56.208527 802:7a4a8160 msg_diag.c:logNdmpPvals:2638 {name: HIST, value: Y}
DG:CM 06/19 11:08:56.208543 802:7a4a8160 msg_diag.c:logNdmpPvals:2638 {name: VERBOSE, value: N}
DG:CM 06/19 11:08:56.208558 802:7a4a8160 msg_diag.c:logNdmpPvals:2638 {name: LEVEL, value: 0}
DG:CM 06/19 11:08:56.208573 802:7a4a8160 msg_diag.c:logNdmpPvals:2638 {name: UPDATE, value: Y}
DG:CM 06/19 11:08:56.208590 802:7a4a8160 msg_diag.c:logNdmpPvals:2638 {name: COMPRESS_DATA_STREAM, value: N}
DG:CM 06/19 11:08:56.208606 802:7a4a8160 msg_diag.c:logNdmpPvals:2638 {name: SNAPSHOT, value: Y}
DG:CM 06/19 11:08:56.208621 802:7a4a8160 msg_diag.c:logNdmpPvals:2638 {name: EXTRACT_ACL, value: Y}
DG:CM 06/19 11:08:56.208639 802:7a4a8160 msg_diag.c:logNdmpPvals:2638 {name: BLOCKING_FACTOR, value: 0}
DG:CM 06/19 11:08:56.208654 802:7a4a8160 msg_diag.c:logNdmpPvals:2638 {name: BASE_DATE, value: -1}
DG:CM 06/19 11:08:56.208669 802:7a4a8160 msg_diag.c:logNdmpPvals:2638 {name: LISTED_INCREMENTAL, value: N}
DG:CM 06/19 11:08:56.208689 802:7a4a8160 msg_diag.c:logNdmpPvals:2638 {name: DEREF_HARD_LINK, value: N}
DG:CM 06/19 11:08:56.208705 802:7a4a8160 msg_diag.c:logNdmpPvals:2638 {name: NUM_DATA_READER, value: -1}
DG:CM 06/19 11:08:56.208721 802:7a4a8160 msg_diag.c:logNdmpPvals:2638 {name: DIRECT, value: N}
DG:CM 06/19 11:08:56.208736 802:7a4a8160 msg_diag.c:logNdmpPvals:2638 {name: RECURSIVE, value: Y}
DG:CM 06/19 11:08:56.208759 802:7a4a8160 msg_diag.c:logNdmpPvals:2638 {name: RESTORE_OVERWRITE, value: Y}
DG:CM 06/19 11:08:56.208775 802:7a4a8160 msg_diag.c:logNdmpPvals:2638 {name: READ_AHEAD, value: }
DG:CM 06/19 11:08:56.208790 802:7a4a8160 msg_diag.c:logNdmpPvals:2638 {name: NUM_FILE_OPENER, value: -1}
DG:CM 06/19 11:08:56.208805 802:7a4a8160 msg_diag.c:ndmp_config_get_butype_info_reply_pri END BUTYPE_INFO

I'm increasing the verbosity of the TSM logs to get more information but I don't have it yet. I was hoping that someone could point me in the right direction as to what I need to change.
↧
Search

Backupsets by Nodegroup Culling

June 20, 2014, 7:09 am
$
0
0
Hello All,

We have a group of nodes that have been using backupsets for archives - by nodegroup. I want to delete a single node's backupset to remove the node but this is the same backupset as the other nodes in the nodegroup are associated with. I wonder if I can delete the backupset by node (the backupset tapes are offline) while preserving the same backupset definition for the other nodes in the nodegroup thus allowing me to remove the dead node.

Has anyone had any experience with this?

Thanks,
Kevin
↧

backup command keeps failing on volumes whose access is set to destroyed

June 20, 2014, 9:29 am
$
0
0
How could I let backup know to ignore those volumes. if that is not possible, how do I remove those volumes

This is an example of the a volume causing backup to stop:

ANR1229W Volume K:\TSM\000E7259.BFS cannot be backed up -
the volume is offline, in use by another process, not
currently mountable, or access mode is "unavailable" or
"destroyed". (SESSION: 5424)




Volume Name: K:\TSM\000E7259.BFS
Storage Pool Name: BACKUPFILE
Device Class Name: FILE
Estimated Capacity: 3,925.5
Scaled Capacity Applied:
Pct Util: 9.7
Volume Status: Full
Access: Destroyed
Pct. Reclaimable Space: 90.3
Scratch Volume?: Yes
In Error State?: No
Number of Writable Sides: 1
Number of Times Mounted: 4
Write Pass Number: 1
Approx. Date Last Written: 05/03/2014 11:24:28
Approx. Date Last Read: 05/05/2014 11:56:18
Date Became Pending:
Number of Write Errors: 0
Number of Read Errors: 0
Volume Location:
Volume is MVS Lanfree Capable : No

Thank you in advance for your help. :-)
↧
↧

[HOWTO] Mixed tape library (yeah, yeah, I know)

June 20, 2014, 2:46 pm
$
0
0
I KNOW the best way to handle this is 2 logical libraries, but that's not possible right now.

3584 library with LTO3 and LTO4 drives.

Device classes are set up with FORMAT=ULTRIUMnC (n=3,4)

The problem I that LTO3 cartridges still gets loaded into LTO4 drives. I know why, since 4s can read/write 3s, but I want to try to prevent this. I figure that if I delete all of the drives and the redefine them by first defining the LTO3, the 4s will always bypass them, but since these would be first on the list, the 3s will always end up in these drives.

Thoughts?
↧

TDP Exchange scheduler failed RC=1204

June 21, 2014, 5:17 am
$
0
0
Hello ,

I'm facing the problem I have not seen that before on any of my TSM enviroment
It's regarding TDP for MS Exchange.

Where to find cause of this error? Is it on TSM Client or on MS Exchange configuration ?
I would really really appreciated for your help .
Basically I have got just like that :

Code:
tsm: TSMSERV01>q eve * * ex=y

Scheduled Start          Actual Start            Schedule Name    Node Name        Status
--------------------    --------------------    -------------    -------------    ---------
12.06.2014 00:00:00      12.06.2014 00:00:26      TDP_EXCH_INC1    TDP_MAIL001        Failed  1204

In tdpexc_incr.log - I found

Code:
ACN5813E Invalid command. Data Protection for Exchange only supports Legacy backups with a backup destination of TSM.
This is part of tdpdsmerror.log
Code:
06/05/2014 01:01:34 ANS1909E The scheduled command failed.
06/05/2014 01:01:34 ANS1512E Scheduled event 'TDP_EXCH_INCR1' failed.  Return code = 1204.
06/08/2014 11:20:15 win32NpWrite(): The named pipe connection was broken .
06/08/2014 11:20:15 sessSendVerb: Error sending Verb, rc: -72
06/08/2014 11:20:15 Error -192 sending request
06/08/2014 11:20:15 cuConfirm: Received rc: -72 trying to send Confirm verb
06/08/2014 11:20:15 ANS1235E An unknown system error has occurred from which TSM cannot recover.
06/08/2014 11:20:15 sessSendVerb: Error sending Verb, rc: -71
06/08/2014 11:20:15 sessSendVerb: Error sending Verb, rc: -71
06/08/2014 11:20:15 ANS1235E An unknown system error has occurred from which TSM cannot recover.
06/08/2014 20:01:15 win32NpWrite(): The named pipe connection was broken .
06/08/2014 20:01:15 sessSendVerb: Error sending Verb, rc: -72
06/08/2014 20:01:15 Error -192 sending request
06/08/2014 20:01:15 cuConfirm: Received rc: -72 trying to send Confirm verb
06/08/2014 20:01:15 ANS1235E An unknown system error has occurred from which TSM cannot recover.
06/08/2014 20:01:15 sessSendVerb: Error sending Verb, rc: -71
06/08/2014 20:01:15 sessSendVerb: Error sending Verb, rc: -71
06/08/2014 20:01:15 ANS1235E An unknown system error has occurred from which TSM cannot recover.
06/09/2014 03:54:47 ANS0278S The transaction will be aborted.
06/09/2014 03:54:47 ANS1315W Unexpected retry request. The server found an error while writing the data.
06/10/2014 01:12:38 ANS1909E The scheduled command failed.
06/10/2014 01:12:38 ANS1512E Scheduled event 'TDP_EXCH_INCR1' failed.  Return code = 1204.
06/11/2014 01:25:24 ANS1909E The scheduled command failed.
06/11/2014 01:25:24 ANS1512E Scheduled event 'TDP_EXCH_INCR1' failed.  Return code = 1204.

And finally this is part from tdpsched.log
Code:
Executing scheduled command now.

06/11/2014 01:25:23 Node Name: TDP_MAIL001
06/11/2014 01:25:23 Session established with server TSMSERV01: AIX-RS/6000
06/11/2014 01:25:23  Server Version 5, Release 5, Level 4.1
06/11/2014 01:25:23  Server date/time: 06/11/2014 00:25:23  Last access: 06/10/2014 13:12:09
06/11/2014 01:25:23 Executing Operating System command or script:    X:\Tivoli\TSM\TDPExchange\bkp_exchange_incr.cmd
06/11/2014 01:25:24 Finished command.  Return code is: 1204
06/11/2014 01:25:24 ANS1909E The scheduled command failed.
06/11/2014 01:25:24 ANS1512E Scheduled event 'TDP_EXCH_INCR1' failed.  Return code = 1204.
06/11/2014 01:25:24 Sending results for scheduled event 'TDP_EXCH_INCR1'.
06/11/2014 01:25:25 Results sent to server for scheduled event 'TDP_EXCH_INCR1'.
06/11/2014 01:25:25 ANS1483I Schedule log pruning started.
06/11/2014 01:25:25 ANS1484I Schedule log pruning finished successfully.
06/11/2014 01:25:25 TSM Backup-Archive Client Version 6, Release 1, Level 0.0 
06/11/2014 01:25:25 Querying server for next scheduled event.
06/11/2014 01:25:25 Node Name: TDP_MAIL001
06/11/2014 01:25:25 Session established with server TSMSERV01: AIX-RS/6000
06/11/2014 01:25:25  Server Version 5, Release 5, Level 4.1
06/11/2014 01:25:25  Server date/time: 06/11/2014 00:25:24  Last access: 06/11/2014 00:25:23

06/11/2014 01:25:25 --- SCHEDULEREC QUERY BEGIN
06/11/2014 01:25:25 --- SCHEDULEREC QUERY END
06/11/2014 01:25:25 Next operation scheduled:
06/11/2014 01:25:25 ------------------------------------------------------------
06/11/2014 01:25:25 Schedule Name:        TDP_EXCH_INCR1
06/11/2014 01:25:25 Action:                Command
06/11/2014 01:25:25 Objects:              X:\Tivoli\TSM\TDPExchange\bkp_exchange_incr.cmd
06/11/2014 01:25:25 Options:             
06/11/2014 01:25:25 Server Window Start:  00:00:00 on 06/12/2014
06/11/2014 01:25:25 ------------------------------------------------------------
06/11/2014 01:25:25 Schedule will be refreshed in 12 hours.
I have compared command executed on another Exchange server (which is working fine) ,and it's identical
↧

SQL Query TB Backed up for a particular period

June 23, 2014, 2:50 am
$
0
0
Hi Guys

Please help !!!!

select sum(BYTES/1099511627776) as "TB's Monthly Report" from SUMMARY where ACTIVITY='BACKUP' and start_time between '2014-05-01 19:00:00.000000' and '2014-05-31 21:00:00.000000'

This is command I tried to get the TB Backed up for May Month.

I also got for June month

But, I couldn't get for April Month ? Why is that.. any retention or something like that.. I need to give this info ASAP :(

April query :
select sum(BYTES/1099511627776) as "TB's Monthly Report" from SUMMARY where ACTIVITY='BACKUP' and start_time between '2014-04-01 19:00:00.000000' and '2014-04-31 21:00:00.000000'
↧
Viewing all 2470 articles
Browse latest View live
Search