delete please
↧
How to Install an TSM BA Client on AIX
↧
TSM Admin job in Columbus, Ohio
Opportunity to be part of an incredible team and work in a leading edge TSM backup environment in Columbus, Ohio. If interested in furthering your career, please apply at https://www.ohiohealth.com/jobs, Job ID 923968.
↧
↧
Space reclamation is ended for volume
Hi everybody,
My problem
__________________________
ANR9999D_1627081930 (ssrecons.c:784) Thread<52>: Byte count mismatch for object 0.206273217 source: 0.62939, target: 0.920075 (PROCESS: 327)
ANR9999D Thread<52> issued message 9999 from: (PROCESS: 327)
ANR1092E Space reclamation is ended for volume S:\TSM_FILE_DEVCLASS\000016AA.BFS. An internal server error was detected. (PROCESS: 327)
ANR9999D Thread<52> issued message 1092 from: (PROCESS: 327)
__________________________
I try to update volume S:\TSM_FILE_DEVCLASS\000016AA.BFS access=readonly and perform a move data but i have this
ANR0984I Process 54 for MOVE DATA started in the BACKGROUND at 09:32:18.
ANR1140I Move data process started for volume S:\TSM_FILE_DEVCLASS\000016AA.BFS
(process ID 54).
ANR8340I FILE volume S:\TSM_FILE_DEVCLASS\00004508.BFS mounted.
ANR8340I FILE volume S:\TSM_FILE_DEVCLASS\000016AA.BFS mounted.
ANR0513I Process 54 opened output volume S:\TSM_FILE_DEVCLASS\00004508.BFS.
ANR0512I Process 54 opened input volume S:\TSM_FILE_DEVCLASS\000016AA.BFS.
ANR9999D_1627081930 (ssrecons.c:784) Thread<59>: Byte count mismatch for object
0.206273217 source: 0.62939, target: 0.920075
ANR9999D Thread<59> issued message 9999 from:
ANR1156W Move data process terminated for volume
S:\TSM_FILE_DEVCLASS\000016AA.BFS - internal server error detected.
ANR9999D Thread<59> issued message 1156 from:
ANR0985I Process 54 for MOVE DATA running in the BACKGROUND completed with
completion state FAILURE at 09:32:18.
ANR0514I Session 995 closed volume S:\TSM_FILE_DEVCLASS\000016AA.BFS.
ANR0514I Session 995 closed volume S:\TSM_FILE_DEVCLASS\00004508.BFS.
I try audit volume S:\TSM_FILE_DEVCLASS\000016AA.BFS
It's success
I try too audit volume S:\TSM_FILE_DEVCLASS\000016AA.BFS fix=yes
Success too with no error.
Anyone have a idea to correct this error?
Regards, Mickael.
My problem
__________________________
ANR9999D_1627081930 (ssrecons.c:784) Thread<52>: Byte count mismatch for object 0.206273217 source: 0.62939, target: 0.920075 (PROCESS: 327)
ANR9999D Thread<52> issued message 9999 from: (PROCESS: 327)
ANR1092E Space reclamation is ended for volume S:\TSM_FILE_DEVCLASS\000016AA.BFS. An internal server error was detected. (PROCESS: 327)
ANR9999D Thread<52> issued message 1092 from: (PROCESS: 327)
__________________________
I try to update volume S:\TSM_FILE_DEVCLASS\000016AA.BFS access=readonly and perform a move data but i have this
ANR0984I Process 54 for MOVE DATA started in the BACKGROUND at 09:32:18.
ANR1140I Move data process started for volume S:\TSM_FILE_DEVCLASS\000016AA.BFS
(process ID 54).
ANR8340I FILE volume S:\TSM_FILE_DEVCLASS\00004508.BFS mounted.
ANR8340I FILE volume S:\TSM_FILE_DEVCLASS\000016AA.BFS mounted.
ANR0513I Process 54 opened output volume S:\TSM_FILE_DEVCLASS\00004508.BFS.
ANR0512I Process 54 opened input volume S:\TSM_FILE_DEVCLASS\000016AA.BFS.
ANR9999D_1627081930 (ssrecons.c:784) Thread<59>: Byte count mismatch for object
0.206273217 source: 0.62939, target: 0.920075
ANR9999D Thread<59> issued message 9999 from:
ANR1156W Move data process terminated for volume
S:\TSM_FILE_DEVCLASS\000016AA.BFS - internal server error detected.
ANR9999D Thread<59> issued message 1156 from:
ANR0985I Process 54 for MOVE DATA running in the BACKGROUND completed with
completion state FAILURE at 09:32:18.
ANR0514I Session 995 closed volume S:\TSM_FILE_DEVCLASS\000016AA.BFS.
ANR0514I Session 995 closed volume S:\TSM_FILE_DEVCLASS\00004508.BFS.
I try audit volume S:\TSM_FILE_DEVCLASS\000016AA.BFS
It's success
I try too audit volume S:\TSM_FILE_DEVCLASS\000016AA.BFS fix=yes
Success too with no error.
Anyone have a idea to correct this error?
Regards, Mickael.
↧
How to solve the problem with ANR0482W?
Hi,
Good day to all forum members.
Need help to solve schedule status Failed with my Lotus Domino, TDP for Domino.
The log is not accused of any database failure however the schedule status is Failed
The error is: ANR0482W.
I found this forum the following explanation on this ANR:
ANR0482W Session <SessionNumber> for <NodeNode> name (<ClientPlatform>)
terminated - idle for more than N minutes.
If the messages reflects 15 minutes, your server still has the product
default IDLETimeout of 15 minutes, which is much too small. Boost it to
60: you need a large value to accommodate clients rummaging around in a
large, relatively inactive file system looking for changed files to back
up. If you have a good-sized value already, investigate why your client
is idle so long...which could occur if you need a password on the
command line and neglected to specify one, which causes the *SM client
to prompt and wait indefinitely.
This message can be expected with dsmadmc sessions, which are commonly
idle for long period where an administrator starts such a session but
only looks in a couple of times a day.
Note that the type of session which times out can be expected to be a
Producer Session - the type responsible for querying the server,
establishing communication with the server, and reporting results to the
server. Producer Sessions are inherently idle as they wait for their
companion Consumer sessions to complete their work. Where a Producer
Session times out and goes away, a new one will appear (ANR0406I,
ANS1810E) as TSM starts it when the Consumer session reaches a point
where it needs some session management work conducted with the TSM
server. The client scheduler log will not show any evidence of the
producer session timeout: its consumer session continues processing the
client files, uninterrupted. Larger RESOURceutilization values make for
more Producer Sessions and thus more exposure to idle timeouts.
-------------
Following excerpts from the activity log
Server Name Date/time Message Number Message
MYTSMSERVER 9/12/2013 20:00 ANR2561I Schedule prompter contacting MY_DOMINO_DOM_DIA (session 1315850) to start a scheduled operation. (SESSION: 32)
MYTSMSERVER 9/12/2013 20:00 ANR0403I Session 1315850 ended for node MY_DOMINO_DOM_DIA (). (SESSION: 32)
MYTSMSERVER 9/12/2013 20:00 ANR0406I Session 1315864 started for node MY_DOMINO_DOM_DIA (WinNT) (Tcp/Ip domino.mycompany.net(51624)). (SESSION: 1315864)
MYTSMSERVER 9/12/2013 20:00 ANR0403I Session 1315864 ended for node MY_DOMINO_DOM_DIA (WinNT). (SESSION: 1315864)
MYTSMSERVER 9/12/2013 20:00 ANR0406I Session 1315866 started for node MY_DOMINO_DOM_DIA (WinNT) (Tcp/Ip domino.mycompany.net(51626)). (SESSION: 1315866)
MYTSMSERVER 9/12/2013 20:04 ANR0406I Session 1315912 started for node MY_DOMINO_DOM_DIA (TDP Domino WIN64) (Tcp/Ip domino.mycompany.net(51661)). (SESSION: 1315912)
MYTSMSERVER 9/12/2013 20:04 ANE4991I (ANE4985I Session: 1315912, ANE4986I Node: MY_DOMINO_DOM_DIA) TDP Domino WIN64 ACD5208 Data Protection for Domino: Starting selective database backup from server MY_DOMINO. (SESSION: 1315912)
MYTSMSERVER 9/12/2013 20:04 ANE4991I (ANE4985I Session: 1315912, ANE4986I Node: MY_DOMINO_DOM_DIA) TDP Domino WIN64 ACD5200 Data Protection for Domino: Starting backup of database activity.nsf from server MY_DOMINO. (SESSION: 1315912)
MYTSMSERVER 9/12/2013 20:04 ANE4991I (ANE4985I Session: 1315912, ANE4986I Node: MY_DOMINO_DOM_DIA) TDP Domino WIN64 ACD5201 Data Protection for Domino: Backup of database activity.nsf from server MY_DOMINO completed successfully. (SESSION: 1315912)
MYTSMSERVER 9/12/2013 20:04 ANE4991I (ANE4985I Session: 1315912, ANE4986I Node: MY_DOMINO_DOM_DIA) TDP Domino WIN64 ACD5200 Data Protection for Domino: Starting backup of database activity.ntf from server MY_DOMINO. (SESSION: 1315912)
MYTSMSERVER 10/12/2013 00:00 ANR0482W Session 1315866 for node MY_DOMINO_DOM_DIA (WinNT) terminated - idle for more than 240 minutes. (SESSION: 1315866)
MYTSMSERVER 10/12/2013 02:37 ANE4991I (ANE4985I Session: 1315912, ANE4986I Node: MY_DOMINO_DOM_DIA) TDP Domino WIN64 ACD5200 Data Protection for Domino: Starting backup of database tmpddm.nsf from server MY_DOMINO. (SESSION: 1315912)
MYTSMSERVER 10/12/2013 02:37 ANE4991I (ANE4985I Session: 1315912, ANE4986I Node: MY_DOMINO_DOM_DIA) TDP Domino WIN64 ACD5201 Data Protection for Domino: Backup of database tmpddm.nsf from server MY_DOMINO completed successfully. (SESSION: 1315912)
MYTSMSERVER 10/12/2013 02:37 ANE4991I (ANE4985I Session: 1315912, ANE4986I Node: MY_DOMINO_DOM_DIA) TDP Domino WIN64 ACD5461 Data Protection for Domino: Selective database backup from server MY_DOMINO complete. Total Domino databases backed up: 4906 Total Domino databases deduplicated: 0 Total bytes inspected: 468,080,573,607 Total bytes transferred: 424394878772 Total LanFree bytes transferred: 0 Total bytes before deduplication: 0 Total bytes after deduplication: 0 Data compressed by: 10% Deduplication reduction: 0,00% Total data reduction ratio: 9,34% Elapsed processing time: 23590,23 Secs Throughput rate: 17568,63 Kb/Sec (SESSION: 1315912)
MYTSMSERVER 10/12/2013 02:37 ANR0403I Session 1315912 ended for node MY_DOMINO_DOM_DIA (TDP Domino WIN64). (SESSION: 1315912)
MYTSMSERVER 10/12/2013 02:37 ANR0406I Session 1321215 started for node MY_DOMINO_DOM_DIA (WinNT) (Tcp/Ip domino.mycompany.net(53174)). (SESSION: 1321215)
MYTSMSERVER 10/12/2013 02:37 ANR2579E Schedule MY_DOMINO_DOM_DIA in domain PD_DOM_DIA for node MY_DOMINO_DOM_DIA failed (return code 402). (SESSION: 1321215)
MYTSMSERVER 10/12/2013 02:37 ANR0403I Session 1321215 ended for node MY_DOMINO_DOM_DIA (WinNT). (SESSION: 1321215)
MYTSMSERVER 10/12/2013 02:37 ANR0406I Session 1321216 started for node MY_DOMINO_DOM_DIA (WinNT) (Tcp/Ip domino.mycompany.net(53175)). (SESSION: 1321216)
MYTSMSERVER 10/12/2013 02:37 ANR0403I Session 1321216 ended for node MY_DOMINO_DOM_DIA (WinNT). (SESSION: 1321216)
--------------------------------
Output query opt
Server Option Option Setting Server Option Option Setting
----------------- -------------------- ----------------- --------------
CommTimeOut 15,000 IdleTimeOut 240
AdminCommTimeOut 60 AdminIdleTimeOut 15
DateFormat 1 (mm/dd/yyyy) TimeFormat 1 (hh:mm:ss)
-------------
Can anyone assist me in resução this problem?
I'm several days without backup this environment.
Already.
Thank you for your attention.
Good day to all forum members.
Need help to solve schedule status Failed with my Lotus Domino, TDP for Domino.
The log is not accused of any database failure however the schedule status is Failed
The error is: ANR0482W.
I found this forum the following explanation on this ANR:
ANR0482W Session <SessionNumber> for <NodeNode> name (<ClientPlatform>)
terminated - idle for more than N minutes.
If the messages reflects 15 minutes, your server still has the product
default IDLETimeout of 15 minutes, which is much too small. Boost it to
60: you need a large value to accommodate clients rummaging around in a
large, relatively inactive file system looking for changed files to back
up. If you have a good-sized value already, investigate why your client
is idle so long...which could occur if you need a password on the
command line and neglected to specify one, which causes the *SM client
to prompt and wait indefinitely.
This message can be expected with dsmadmc sessions, which are commonly
idle for long period where an administrator starts such a session but
only looks in a couple of times a day.
Note that the type of session which times out can be expected to be a
Producer Session - the type responsible for querying the server,
establishing communication with the server, and reporting results to the
server. Producer Sessions are inherently idle as they wait for their
companion Consumer sessions to complete their work. Where a Producer
Session times out and goes away, a new one will appear (ANR0406I,
ANS1810E) as TSM starts it when the Consumer session reaches a point
where it needs some session management work conducted with the TSM
server. The client scheduler log will not show any evidence of the
producer session timeout: its consumer session continues processing the
client files, uninterrupted. Larger RESOURceutilization values make for
more Producer Sessions and thus more exposure to idle timeouts.
-------------
Following excerpts from the activity log
Server Name Date/time Message Number Message
MYTSMSERVER 9/12/2013 20:00 ANR2561I Schedule prompter contacting MY_DOMINO_DOM_DIA (session 1315850) to start a scheduled operation. (SESSION: 32)
MYTSMSERVER 9/12/2013 20:00 ANR0403I Session 1315850 ended for node MY_DOMINO_DOM_DIA (). (SESSION: 32)
MYTSMSERVER 9/12/2013 20:00 ANR0406I Session 1315864 started for node MY_DOMINO_DOM_DIA (WinNT) (Tcp/Ip domino.mycompany.net(51624)). (SESSION: 1315864)
MYTSMSERVER 9/12/2013 20:00 ANR0403I Session 1315864 ended for node MY_DOMINO_DOM_DIA (WinNT). (SESSION: 1315864)
MYTSMSERVER 9/12/2013 20:00 ANR0406I Session 1315866 started for node MY_DOMINO_DOM_DIA (WinNT) (Tcp/Ip domino.mycompany.net(51626)). (SESSION: 1315866)
MYTSMSERVER 9/12/2013 20:04 ANR0406I Session 1315912 started for node MY_DOMINO_DOM_DIA (TDP Domino WIN64) (Tcp/Ip domino.mycompany.net(51661)). (SESSION: 1315912)
MYTSMSERVER 9/12/2013 20:04 ANE4991I (ANE4985I Session: 1315912, ANE4986I Node: MY_DOMINO_DOM_DIA) TDP Domino WIN64 ACD5208 Data Protection for Domino: Starting selective database backup from server MY_DOMINO. (SESSION: 1315912)
MYTSMSERVER 9/12/2013 20:04 ANE4991I (ANE4985I Session: 1315912, ANE4986I Node: MY_DOMINO_DOM_DIA) TDP Domino WIN64 ACD5200 Data Protection for Domino: Starting backup of database activity.nsf from server MY_DOMINO. (SESSION: 1315912)
MYTSMSERVER 9/12/2013 20:04 ANE4991I (ANE4985I Session: 1315912, ANE4986I Node: MY_DOMINO_DOM_DIA) TDP Domino WIN64 ACD5201 Data Protection for Domino: Backup of database activity.nsf from server MY_DOMINO completed successfully. (SESSION: 1315912)
MYTSMSERVER 9/12/2013 20:04 ANE4991I (ANE4985I Session: 1315912, ANE4986I Node: MY_DOMINO_DOM_DIA) TDP Domino WIN64 ACD5200 Data Protection for Domino: Starting backup of database activity.ntf from server MY_DOMINO. (SESSION: 1315912)
MYTSMSERVER 10/12/2013 00:00 ANR0482W Session 1315866 for node MY_DOMINO_DOM_DIA (WinNT) terminated - idle for more than 240 minutes. (SESSION: 1315866)
MYTSMSERVER 10/12/2013 02:37 ANE4991I (ANE4985I Session: 1315912, ANE4986I Node: MY_DOMINO_DOM_DIA) TDP Domino WIN64 ACD5200 Data Protection for Domino: Starting backup of database tmpddm.nsf from server MY_DOMINO. (SESSION: 1315912)
MYTSMSERVER 10/12/2013 02:37 ANE4991I (ANE4985I Session: 1315912, ANE4986I Node: MY_DOMINO_DOM_DIA) TDP Domino WIN64 ACD5201 Data Protection for Domino: Backup of database tmpddm.nsf from server MY_DOMINO completed successfully. (SESSION: 1315912)
MYTSMSERVER 10/12/2013 02:37 ANE4991I (ANE4985I Session: 1315912, ANE4986I Node: MY_DOMINO_DOM_DIA) TDP Domino WIN64 ACD5461 Data Protection for Domino: Selective database backup from server MY_DOMINO complete. Total Domino databases backed up: 4906 Total Domino databases deduplicated: 0 Total bytes inspected: 468,080,573,607 Total bytes transferred: 424394878772 Total LanFree bytes transferred: 0 Total bytes before deduplication: 0 Total bytes after deduplication: 0 Data compressed by: 10% Deduplication reduction: 0,00% Total data reduction ratio: 9,34% Elapsed processing time: 23590,23 Secs Throughput rate: 17568,63 Kb/Sec (SESSION: 1315912)
MYTSMSERVER 10/12/2013 02:37 ANR0403I Session 1315912 ended for node MY_DOMINO_DOM_DIA (TDP Domino WIN64). (SESSION: 1315912)
MYTSMSERVER 10/12/2013 02:37 ANR0406I Session 1321215 started for node MY_DOMINO_DOM_DIA (WinNT) (Tcp/Ip domino.mycompany.net(53174)). (SESSION: 1321215)
MYTSMSERVER 10/12/2013 02:37 ANR2579E Schedule MY_DOMINO_DOM_DIA in domain PD_DOM_DIA for node MY_DOMINO_DOM_DIA failed (return code 402). (SESSION: 1321215)
MYTSMSERVER 10/12/2013 02:37 ANR0403I Session 1321215 ended for node MY_DOMINO_DOM_DIA (WinNT). (SESSION: 1321215)
MYTSMSERVER 10/12/2013 02:37 ANR0406I Session 1321216 started for node MY_DOMINO_DOM_DIA (WinNT) (Tcp/Ip domino.mycompany.net(53175)). (SESSION: 1321216)
MYTSMSERVER 10/12/2013 02:37 ANR0403I Session 1321216 ended for node MY_DOMINO_DOM_DIA (WinNT). (SESSION: 1321216)
--------------------------------
Output query opt
Server Option Option Setting Server Option Option Setting
----------------- -------------------- ----------------- --------------
CommTimeOut 15,000 IdleTimeOut 240
AdminCommTimeOut 60 AdminIdleTimeOut 15
DateFormat 1 (mm/dd/yyyy) TimeFormat 1 (hh:mm:ss)
-------------
Can anyone assist me in resução this problem?
I'm several days without backup this environment.
Already.
Thank you for your attention.
↧
Question Backupset
I everybody,
By curiosity i want to understand how backupset work
If i do
generate backupset node_name prefix_name devclass=LTO_CLASS_1 scratch=yes datatype=all
The client node_name have all of his data on one tape ?
If ihave a second TSM and i do a
define backupset node_name prefix_name devclass=LTO_CLASS_1 volumes=volume_name wheredatatypes=all
the client node_name have now all of his data on the TSM server2 too ??
Regards, Mickael
By curiosity i want to understand how backupset work
If i do
generate backupset node_name prefix_name devclass=LTO_CLASS_1 scratch=yes datatype=all
The client node_name have all of his data on one tape ?
If ihave a second TSM and i do a
define backupset node_name prefix_name devclass=LTO_CLASS_1 volumes=volume_name wheredatatypes=all
the client node_name have now all of his data on the TSM server2 too ??
Regards, Mickael
↧
↧
What to expect after a successful cluster failover DURING a TDP backup/archive?
Hi. The organization I work for has dozens of MS-SQL DBs hosted in Windows machines and clustered as MS Resource Groups, about 20 of them. TDP4SQL is properly configured in all of them, and when a cluster failover happens, or resource group ownership is changed on purpose, the new owner node assumes properly its TSM functions. It have happened and worked fine a bunch of times, I can confirm.
But what is it normal to expect if somebody changes the owner node while a scheduled TSM backup or archive is running ?
Shall the backup/archive schedule fail, because node parameters changed on the fly, or shall it end successfully ?
Thanks for any answer, and sorry if the subject has been already discussed here ( I couldn't find any related info on WWW, tried all keywords combinations I can imagine).
But what is it normal to expect if somebody changes the owner node while a scheduled TSM backup or archive is running ?
Shall the backup/archive schedule fail, because node parameters changed on the fly, or shall it end successfully ?
Thanks for any answer, and sorry if the subject has been already discussed here ( I couldn't find any related info on WWW, tried all keywords combinations I can imagine).
↧
restarting pre-empted migration process
I have a library with four LTO-5 drives. I have TSM 6.2.0 setup with six nodes and migproc=4 for my stg pool.
In the case I have 4 migration processes going at once. I issue a restore command and eventually I see in the activitly log something like this:
ANR1440I All drives in use. Process 27 being preempted by
higher priority operation. (SESSION: 271)
ANR1020W Migration process 27 terminated for storage pool
BACKUPPOOL - process canceled. (PROCESS: 27)
I then see the restore process run through lots of tapes and then complete normally, but then a migration process never starts back again. I have to halt the server and restart completely or kill the other 3 running processes first to get 4 migrations processes running again.
Anyone know if this is a known bug or know of any solution?
In the case I have 4 migration processes going at once. I issue a restore command and eventually I see in the activitly log something like this:
ANR1440I All drives in use. Process 27 being preempted by
higher priority operation. (SESSION: 271)
ANR1020W Migration process 27 terminated for storage pool
BACKUPPOOL - process canceled. (PROCESS: 27)
I then see the restore process run through lots of tapes and then complete normally, but then a migration process never starts back again. I have to halt the server and restart completely or kill the other 3 running processes first to get 4 migrations processes running again.
Anyone know if this is a known bug or know of any solution?
↧
Error ANR9999D in TSM logs
Hello everyone,
I have a problem with a TSM Server. When I run any command (for example AUDIT LIBRARY), I get these errors in the log:
12/13/13 11:27:33 ANR8457I AUDIT LIBRARY: Operation for library TS3100
started as process 353. (SESSION: 21269, PROCESS: 353)
12/13/13 11:27:34 ANR9999D_3457863330 RefreshSlotInfo(mmsscsi.c:9248)
Thread<60429>: Element address mismatch; slotInfo.elem =
4118, slotInv.addr = 0 (SESSION: 21269, PROCESS: 353)
12/13/13 11:27:34 ANR9999D Thread<60429> issued message 9999 from: (SESSION:
21269, PROCESS: 353)
12/13/13 11:27:34 ANR9999D Thread<60429> 0x0000000100012440 StdPutText
(SESSION: 21269, PROCESS: 353)
12/13/13 11:27:34 ANR9999D Thread<60429> 0x0000000100012cfc OutDiagToCons
(SESSION: 21269, PROCESS: 353)
12/13/13 11:27:34 ANR9999D Thread<60429> 0x000000010000e51c outDiagfExt
(SESSION: 21269, PROCESS: 353)
12/13/13 11:27:34 ANR9999D Thread<60429> 0x000000010044b390 RefreshSlotInfo
(SESSION: 21269, PROCESS: 353)
12/13/13 11:27:34 ANR9999D Thread<60429> 0x000000010044087c
ValidateSlotInfo (SESSION: 21269, PROCESS: 353)
12/13/13 11:27:34 ANR9999D Thread<60429> 0x000000010043e5f0 ScsiAudit
(SESSION: 21269, PROCESS: 353)
12/13/13 11:27:34 ANR9999D Thread<60429> 0x00000001003b96d8
MmsLtsAudit@AF78_49 (SESSION: 21269, PROCESS: 353)
12/13/13 11:27:34 ANR9999D Thread<60429> 0x000000010005ca94 AuditThread
(SESSION: 21269, PROCESS: 353)
12/13/13 11:27:34 ANR9999D Thread<60429> 0x00000001000094a4 StartThread
(SESSION: 21269, PROCESS: 353)
12/13/13 11:27:34 ANR8460E AUDIT LIBRARY process for library TS3100 failed.
(SESSION: 21269, PROCESS: 353)
12/13/13 11:27:34 ANR0985I Process 353 for AUDIT LIBRARY running in the
BACKGROUND completed with completion state FAILURE at
11:27:34. (SESSION: 21269, PROCESS: 353)
Does anyone have an idea why this happens?
A week ago IBM support changed the DRIVE by a fault, but has been running fine until today. The drive has the same name that the old.
Thanks in advance. Regards.
I have a problem with a TSM Server. When I run any command (for example AUDIT LIBRARY), I get these errors in the log:
12/13/13 11:27:33 ANR8457I AUDIT LIBRARY: Operation for library TS3100
started as process 353. (SESSION: 21269, PROCESS: 353)
12/13/13 11:27:34 ANR9999D_3457863330 RefreshSlotInfo(mmsscsi.c:9248)
Thread<60429>: Element address mismatch; slotInfo.elem =
4118, slotInv.addr = 0 (SESSION: 21269, PROCESS: 353)
12/13/13 11:27:34 ANR9999D Thread<60429> issued message 9999 from: (SESSION:
21269, PROCESS: 353)
12/13/13 11:27:34 ANR9999D Thread<60429> 0x0000000100012440 StdPutText
(SESSION: 21269, PROCESS: 353)
12/13/13 11:27:34 ANR9999D Thread<60429> 0x0000000100012cfc OutDiagToCons
(SESSION: 21269, PROCESS: 353)
12/13/13 11:27:34 ANR9999D Thread<60429> 0x000000010000e51c outDiagfExt
(SESSION: 21269, PROCESS: 353)
12/13/13 11:27:34 ANR9999D Thread<60429> 0x000000010044b390 RefreshSlotInfo
(SESSION: 21269, PROCESS: 353)
12/13/13 11:27:34 ANR9999D Thread<60429> 0x000000010044087c
ValidateSlotInfo (SESSION: 21269, PROCESS: 353)
12/13/13 11:27:34 ANR9999D Thread<60429> 0x000000010043e5f0 ScsiAudit
(SESSION: 21269, PROCESS: 353)
12/13/13 11:27:34 ANR9999D Thread<60429> 0x00000001003b96d8
MmsLtsAudit@AF78_49 (SESSION: 21269, PROCESS: 353)
12/13/13 11:27:34 ANR9999D Thread<60429> 0x000000010005ca94 AuditThread
(SESSION: 21269, PROCESS: 353)
12/13/13 11:27:34 ANR9999D Thread<60429> 0x00000001000094a4 StartThread
(SESSION: 21269, PROCESS: 353)
12/13/13 11:27:34 ANR8460E AUDIT LIBRARY process for library TS3100 failed.
(SESSION: 21269, PROCESS: 353)
12/13/13 11:27:34 ANR0985I Process 353 for AUDIT LIBRARY running in the
BACKGROUND completed with completion state FAILURE at
11:27:34. (SESSION: 21269, PROCESS: 353)
Does anyone have an idea why this happens?
A week ago IBM support changed the DRIVE by a fault, but has been running fine until today. The drive has the same name that the old.
Thanks in advance. Regards.
↧
moving tsm5.4 db to new disks on aix
Hi,
TSM5.4 running on AIX5.3
I need to move my tsm5.4 database to a new disk subsystem with much larger disks.
I understand the normal way of doing this - ie define new volumes and then delete the old volumes, forcing tsm to move the contents to the empty disks bu this is likely to be very slow as the database is > 400GB.
Since I'm on AIX, I was thinking that the easiest way would be to simply use the migratepv command and let aix do the work in the background. This way, tsm shouldn't be aware that anything has changed as it will see the same sized volumes in the same filesystems;underneath the covers, aix will have moved the logical volumes from many small physical disks to a single large disk.
An alternative would be to mirror each logical volume at the operating system level and then, when the mirrors are synchronised, remove the primary copy. Again, since this is aix mirroring, tsm should be none the wiser.
Has anyone done this and what approach would you recommend. It's something that I've done many times with other applications such as oracle but I'd like to know if there's any gotchas if I do it with tsm.
TSM5.4 running on AIX5.3
I need to move my tsm5.4 database to a new disk subsystem with much larger disks.
I understand the normal way of doing this - ie define new volumes and then delete the old volumes, forcing tsm to move the contents to the empty disks bu this is likely to be very slow as the database is > 400GB.
Since I'm on AIX, I was thinking that the easiest way would be to simply use the migratepv command and let aix do the work in the background. This way, tsm shouldn't be aware that anything has changed as it will see the same sized volumes in the same filesystems;underneath the covers, aix will have moved the logical volumes from many small physical disks to a single large disk.
An alternative would be to mirror each logical volume at the operating system level and then, when the mirrors are synchronised, remove the primary copy. Again, since this is aix mirroring, tsm should be none the wiser.
Has anyone done this and what approach would you recommend. It's something that I've done many times with other applications such as oracle but I'd like to know if there's any gotchas if I do it with tsm.
↧
↧
Database question :)
Hi everybody,
I have a question for you (SniperKing if you know lol)
In my dream i'am ask if it's possible to have to TSM sharing database?
I'am explain better
I want a TSM in charge of the stockage on tape and share his database (or echange information with the other database) with an another TSM (in charge of the backupset in other)
Or i want to put in place a TSM in Clustering with another in case of the TSM server go down i continu to have a TSM in rescues.
Do you understand what i want or may be it's a stupid idea lol
Regards, Mickael.
I have a question for you (SniperKing if you know lol)
In my dream i'am ask if it's possible to have to TSM sharing database?
I'am explain better
I want a TSM in charge of the stockage on tape and share his database (or echange information with the other database) with an another TSM (in charge of the backupset in other)
Or i want to put in place a TSM in Clustering with another in case of the TSM server go down i continu to have a TSM in rescues.
Do you understand what i want or may be it's a stupid idea lol
Regards, Mickael.
↧
ACN5086W None of the storage groups entered exist.
Hi Guys,
I have three storage group in a exchange server (SG1,SG2 & SG3).
TDP exchange backup is running fine when i use 'tdpexcc backup * full' in command files and its using single session for the backup.
But when i tried to run backup by making command line as "tdpexcc backup SG1 full /excserver=xxxxx /tsmoptfile=dsm_04.opt /logfile=excsch1.log >> excfull1.log " i am getting error as below.( Here I am trying to run backup in 3 paralled session by adding three command for each storage group)
Please let me know what is wrong with command and how to fix it.
error log:
12/14/2013 06:57:33 ============== Log file pruned using log retention period of 60 day(s)
12/14/2013 06:57:33 ============== No log entries pruned
12/14/2013 06:57:33 ================================================== =======================
12/14/2013 06:57:33 Request : Backup
12/14/2013 06:57:33 SG List : SG1
12/14/2013 06:57:33 Backup Type : FULL
12/14/2013 06:57:33 Database Name :
12/14/2013 06:57:33 Buffers : 3
12/14/2013 06:57:33 Buffersize : 1024
12/14/2013 06:57:33 Exchange Server : xxxxx
12/14/2013 06:57:33 TSM Node Name :
12/14/2013 06:57:33 TSM Options File : dsm_04.opt
12/14/2013 06:57:33 Mount Wait : Yes
12/14/2013 06:57:33 Quiet : No
12/14/2013 06:57:33 -------------------------------------------------------------------------
12/14/2013 06:57:35 ACN5086W None of the storage groups entered exist. Or, if doing a DBCOPY backup, the database entered does not exist.
12/14/2013 06:57:35 Total storage groups requested for backup: 1
12/14/2013 06:57:35 Total storage groups backed up: 0
12/14/2013 06:57:35 Total storage groups expired: 0
12/14/2013 06:57:35 Total storage groups excluded: 0
12/14/2013 06:57:35 Throughput rate: 0.00 Kb/Sec
12/14/2013 06:57:35 Total bytes transferred: 0
12/14/2013 06:57:35 Elapsed processing time: 0.00 Secs
12/14/2013 06:57:35 ACN0151E Errors occurred while processing the request.
12/14/2013 06:58:29 ============== Log file pruned using log retention period of 60 day(s)
12/14/2013 06:58:29 ============== No log entries pruned
12/14/2013 06:58:29 ================================================== =======================
I have three storage group in a exchange server (SG1,SG2 & SG3).
TDP exchange backup is running fine when i use 'tdpexcc backup * full' in command files and its using single session for the backup.
But when i tried to run backup by making command line as "tdpexcc backup SG1 full /excserver=xxxxx /tsmoptfile=dsm_04.opt /logfile=excsch1.log >> excfull1.log " i am getting error as below.( Here I am trying to run backup in 3 paralled session by adding three command for each storage group)
Please let me know what is wrong with command and how to fix it.
error log:
12/14/2013 06:57:33 ============== Log file pruned using log retention period of 60 day(s)
12/14/2013 06:57:33 ============== No log entries pruned
12/14/2013 06:57:33 ================================================== =======================
12/14/2013 06:57:33 Request : Backup
12/14/2013 06:57:33 SG List : SG1
12/14/2013 06:57:33 Backup Type : FULL
12/14/2013 06:57:33 Database Name :
12/14/2013 06:57:33 Buffers : 3
12/14/2013 06:57:33 Buffersize : 1024
12/14/2013 06:57:33 Exchange Server : xxxxx
12/14/2013 06:57:33 TSM Node Name :
12/14/2013 06:57:33 TSM Options File : dsm_04.opt
12/14/2013 06:57:33 Mount Wait : Yes
12/14/2013 06:57:33 Quiet : No
12/14/2013 06:57:33 -------------------------------------------------------------------------
12/14/2013 06:57:35 ACN5086W None of the storage groups entered exist. Or, if doing a DBCOPY backup, the database entered does not exist.
12/14/2013 06:57:35 Total storage groups requested for backup: 1
12/14/2013 06:57:35 Total storage groups backed up: 0
12/14/2013 06:57:35 Total storage groups expired: 0
12/14/2013 06:57:35 Total storage groups excluded: 0
12/14/2013 06:57:35 Throughput rate: 0.00 Kb/Sec
12/14/2013 06:57:35 Total bytes transferred: 0
12/14/2013 06:57:35 Elapsed processing time: 0.00 Secs
12/14/2013 06:57:35 ACN0151E Errors occurred while processing the request.
12/14/2013 06:58:29 ============== Log file pruned using log retention period of 60 day(s)
12/14/2013 06:58:29 ============== No log entries pruned
12/14/2013 06:58:29 ================================================== =======================
↧
Windows 2012 std tsmnet64 stuck
Hi,
i've installed tsm server ver 6.3.4.2 on a server with windows 2012 std.
All works fine but the monitor on tsmnet64 display anything.
Only Monitor Started for TSM SERVER1 on TSMSRV.
If i change password with worng one the result is the SAME!
Help me.
TKS:
i've installed tsm server ver 6.3.4.2 on a server with windows 2012 std.
All works fine but the monitor on tsmnet64 display anything.
Only Monitor Started for TSM SERVER1 on TSMSRV.
If i change password with worng one the result is the SAME!
Help me.
TKS:
↧
inquiries
Please advise if the following can be done via TSM:- Server less backup
- Ability to take snapshot
- VSS volume shadow copy services
I need to give me your experience with TSM and licensing on capacity basis (licensed per TB, not PVUs)
Which command should be run as assessment command to get the complete information of TSM server DB, backed up Data size?
Thanks
- Ability to take snapshot
- VSS volume shadow copy services
I need to give me your experience with TSM and licensing on capacity basis (licensed per TB, not PVUs)
Which command should be run as assessment command to get the complete information of TSM server DB, backed up Data size?
Thanks
↧
↧
Restore VM to alternate location drops NIC in VC
Hi.
Having an issue when i restore VM's to alternate location it drops the NIC on server in virtual center. i have to re-add it again ad connect to right vswitch (restore-test). It's fine that nic switch information will be dropped BUT not the whole nic.
If i restore to original place it works.
Customer runnig latest 6.4 TSM 4 VE and vmware 5.1 enviroment.
Have anyone seen this
Regards
Bjorn
Having an issue when i restore VM's to alternate location it drops the NIC on server in virtual center. i have to re-add it again ad connect to right vswitch (restore-test). It's fine that nic switch information will be dropped BUT not the whole nic.
If i restore to original place it works.
Customer runnig latest 6.4 TSM 4 VE and vmware 5.1 enviroment.
Have anyone seen this
Regards
Bjorn
↧
ANR8944E and move data
Hi everybody,
I try to performe a move data
move data A00015L3 stg=tapepool2 reconst=yes
and it's work for this time but i have an error ANR8944E in the actlog
ANR8944E Hardware or media error on drive DRIVE2 (\\.\Tape1) with volume
A00015L3(OP=READ, Error Number= 23, CC=0, KEY=03, ASC=31, ASCQ=00,
SENSE=F0.00.03.00.04.00.00.58.00.00.00.00.31.00.36 .00.70.75.00.14,
Description=An undetermined error has occurred). Refer to Appendix C in the
'Messages' manual for recommended action.
i look q proc and the moved files is reduced i don't understand the move data continu..
tsm: TSM_SERVER1>q proc
Process Process Description Status
Number
-------- -------------------- ------------------------------------------------
1,608 Move Data Volume A00015L3 (storage pool TAPEPOOL), Target
Pool TAPEPOOL2, Moved Files: 9603, Moved Bytes:
6,140,301,389, Unreadable Files: 0, Unreadable
Bytes: 0. Current Physical File (bytes):
48,614,958 Current input volume: A00015L3.
Current output volume: L:\BANDES\00004502.BFS.
And after the error
tsm: TSM_SERVER1>q proc
Process Process Description Status
Number
-------- -------------------- -------------------------------------------------
1,608 Move Data Volume A00015L3 (storage pool TAPEPOOL), Target
Pool TAPEPOOL2, Moved Files: 6455, Moved Bytes:
4,299,012,246, Unreadable Files: 0, Unreadable
Bytes: 0. Current Physical File (bytes):
26,237,247 Current input volume: A00015L3.
Current output volume: L:\BANDES\00004502.BFS.
Anyone have got the same probleme ?
Thanks by advance.
Regars, Mickael.
Edit post:
The move data continu but now i have 53 unreadable files
tsm: TSM_SERVER1>q proc
Process Process Description Status
Number
-------- -------------------- -------------------------------------------------
1,608 Move Data Volume A00015L3 (storage pool TAPEPOOL), Target
Pool TAPEPOOL2, Moved Files: 11944, Moved Bytes:
8,162,691,662, Unreadable Files: 53, Unreadable
Bytes: 26,237,247. Current Physical File
(bytes): 25,906,192 Current input volume:
A00015L3. Current output volume:
L:\BANDES\00004502.BFS.
I try to performe a move data
move data A00015L3 stg=tapepool2 reconst=yes
and it's work for this time but i have an error ANR8944E in the actlog
ANR8944E Hardware or media error on drive DRIVE2 (\\.\Tape1) with volume
A00015L3(OP=READ, Error Number= 23, CC=0, KEY=03, ASC=31, ASCQ=00,
SENSE=F0.00.03.00.04.00.00.58.00.00.00.00.31.00.36 .00.70.75.00.14,
Description=An undetermined error has occurred). Refer to Appendix C in the
'Messages' manual for recommended action.
i look q proc and the moved files is reduced i don't understand the move data continu..
tsm: TSM_SERVER1>q proc
Process Process Description Status
Number
-------- -------------------- ------------------------------------------------
1,608 Move Data Volume A00015L3 (storage pool TAPEPOOL), Target
Pool TAPEPOOL2, Moved Files: 9603, Moved Bytes:
6,140,301,389, Unreadable Files: 0, Unreadable
Bytes: 0. Current Physical File (bytes):
48,614,958 Current input volume: A00015L3.
Current output volume: L:\BANDES\00004502.BFS.
And after the error
tsm: TSM_SERVER1>q proc
Process Process Description Status
Number
-------- -------------------- -------------------------------------------------
1,608 Move Data Volume A00015L3 (storage pool TAPEPOOL), Target
Pool TAPEPOOL2, Moved Files: 6455, Moved Bytes:
4,299,012,246, Unreadable Files: 0, Unreadable
Bytes: 0. Current Physical File (bytes):
26,237,247 Current input volume: A00015L3.
Current output volume: L:\BANDES\00004502.BFS.
Anyone have got the same probleme ?
Thanks by advance.
Regars, Mickael.
Edit post:
The move data continu but now i have 53 unreadable files
tsm: TSM_SERVER1>q proc
Process Process Description Status
Number
-------- -------------------- -------------------------------------------------
1,608 Move Data Volume A00015L3 (storage pool TAPEPOOL), Target
Pool TAPEPOOL2, Moved Files: 11944, Moved Bytes:
8,162,691,662, Unreadable Files: 53, Unreadable
Bytes: 26,237,247. Current Physical File
(bytes): 25,906,192 Current input volume:
A00015L3. Current output volume:
L:\BANDES\00004502.BFS.
↧
Command to determine Administrator version installed AIX
Looking for command(AIX or TSM) to display Admin Center version installed on AIX TSM server without logging onto Tivoli Integrated Portal.
↧
VSS and shared Dynamic serialization
I am trying to fifure out how these 2 play together.
I have set snapshotprovider vss in the dsm.opt file
I have the serializtaion set to shared dynamic
I have always been under the impression/belief that the TSM client would try to use vss first, and then use the shared dynamic if VSS cannot do the job but I have been told that this is not so from another source and that it should be static/shared static....... this does not make sense to me but I am happy to be corrected.
I have set snapshotprovider vss in the dsm.opt file
I have the serializtaion set to shared dynamic
I have always been under the impression/belief that the TSM client would try to use vss first, and then use the shared dynamic if VSS cannot do the job but I have been told that this is not so from another source and that it should be static/shared static....... this does not make sense to me but I am happy to be corrected.
↧
↧
TSM exchange for DAG
Hi, All
We have just implemented TSM for Exchange 2010 in a DAG environment, configured with a DAG Nodename.
Has anyone implemented a Daily/Weekly/Monthly Backup schedule for a DAG environment, we require some pretty large retention policies for our data and I require some additional information (outlined below)
Version to be implemented:
Daily - 7 versions
Weekly - 4 versions
Monthly - 13 versions
Type of backups:
Daily - Incremental to weekly fulls
Weekly - Full
Monthly - Full
1. Does Exchange incremental count as a version in a TSM management class (eg. As in TSM for VMware it doesnt)
2. Can I create a second DAG nodename for the monthly management class and just have seperated exch.opt files
Hoping for some guidelines to properly implement these retentions.
We have just implemented TSM for Exchange 2010 in a DAG environment, configured with a DAG Nodename.
Has anyone implemented a Daily/Weekly/Monthly Backup schedule for a DAG environment, we require some pretty large retention policies for our data and I require some additional information (outlined below)
Version to be implemented:
Daily - 7 versions
Weekly - 4 versions
Monthly - 13 versions
Type of backups:
Daily - Incremental to weekly fulls
Weekly - Full
Monthly - Full
1. Does Exchange incremental count as a version in a TSM management class (eg. As in TSM for VMware it doesnt)
2. Can I create a second DAG nodename for the monthly management class and just have seperated exch.opt files
Hoping for some guidelines to properly implement these retentions.
↧
ACN5073E None of components entered are in a state to be backed up.
Hi,
I could not find a definitive answer to the "ACN5073E None of components entered are in a state to be backed up error" on ADSM or IBM site.
Basically when I try to run an Exch2010 TDP .cmd schedule file manually I get the ACN5073E error.
I get as far as:
Updating mailbox history on TSM Server
Mailbox history has been updated successfully
Querying Exch Server......
and then it fails...
ACN5073E None of the components entered are in a state to be backed up
My schedule also fails to run
12/17/2013 15:07:42 ANS1909E The scheduled command failed.
12/17/2013 15:07:42 ANS1512E Scheduled event 'UDSMBX_TDP2_TUE1' failed. Return code = 1.
My hunch is permissions as I can manually backup the relevant DB's from the TDP CLI and GUI. I don't know where to look in terms of permissions. The account that runs the TDP Scheduler Service has all the necessary Exchange permissions??
All help much appreciated.
Wesley
I could not find a definitive answer to the "ACN5073E None of components entered are in a state to be backed up error" on ADSM or IBM site.
Basically when I try to run an Exch2010 TDP .cmd schedule file manually I get the ACN5073E error.
I get as far as:
Updating mailbox history on TSM Server
Mailbox history has been updated successfully
Querying Exch Server......
and then it fails...
ACN5073E None of the components entered are in a state to be backed up
My schedule also fails to run
12/17/2013 15:07:42 ANS1909E The scheduled command failed.
12/17/2013 15:07:42 ANS1512E Scheduled event 'UDSMBX_TDP2_TUE1' failed. Return code = 1.
My hunch is permissions as I can manually backup the relevant DB's from the TDP CLI and GUI. I don't know where to look in terms of permissions. The account that runs the TDP Scheduler Service has all the necessary Exchange permissions??
All help much appreciated.
Wesley
↧
TSM 7.1 Install Wizard problem
I am trying to install TSM on a Windows 2008 R2 Enterprise server. When process gets to the point where db2icrt is run it errors out with the following
Tue Dec 17 09:49:48 CST 2013 com.tivoli.dsm.ServerConfig.ServerDB.createDb2Inst ance(): Creating db2 instance with cmd: "D:\Program Files\Tivoli\TSM\db2\bin\db2icrt" TSMINST1 -u USA\TSMSVCACCOUNT001
Tue Dec 17 09:49:48 CST 2013 com.tivoli.dsm.ServerConfig.ServerDB.createDb2Inst ance(): rc from cmd was -1921
Tue Dec 17 09:49:48 CST 2013 com.tivoli.dsm.ServerConfig.ServerDB.createDb2Inst ance(): Stdout:
Tue Dec 17 09:49:48 CST 2013 com.tivoli.dsm.ServerConfig.ServerDB.createDb2Inst ance(): Stderr:
Tue Dec 17 09:49:48 CST 2013 com.tivoli.dsm.ServerConfig.ServerDB.createDb2Inst ance(): exit, rc 302
I tried to run the db2icrt command using my personal user account instead of the service account and it worked. The service account has admin rights and logon as a service rights. What are we missing here?
Thanks,
-Rowl
Tue Dec 17 09:49:48 CST 2013 com.tivoli.dsm.ServerConfig.ServerDB.createDb2Inst ance(): Creating db2 instance with cmd: "D:\Program Files\Tivoli\TSM\db2\bin\db2icrt" TSMINST1 -u USA\TSMSVCACCOUNT001
Tue Dec 17 09:49:48 CST 2013 com.tivoli.dsm.ServerConfig.ServerDB.createDb2Inst ance(): rc from cmd was -1921
Tue Dec 17 09:49:48 CST 2013 com.tivoli.dsm.ServerConfig.ServerDB.createDb2Inst ance(): Stdout:
Tue Dec 17 09:49:48 CST 2013 com.tivoli.dsm.ServerConfig.ServerDB.createDb2Inst ance(): Stderr:
Tue Dec 17 09:49:48 CST 2013 com.tivoli.dsm.ServerConfig.ServerDB.createDb2Inst ance(): exit, rc 302
I tried to run the db2icrt command using my personal user account instead of the service account and it worked. The service account has admin rights and logon as a service rights. What are we missing here?
Thanks,
-Rowl
↧